Weber Jumbo Joe 18 vs Smokey Mountain 22

240 sq in at 19.7 in tall for $89.99 against 726 sq in at 48.5 in for $549. A carry-around kettle for four to six against Weber's largest smoker, sized for 10 to 12.

The verdict

We pick the Weber Jumbo Joe Charcoal Grill 18

Buy the Jumbo Joe first. It costs $89.99, sears direct, banks coals for indirect chicken, and teaches the damper control both cookers run on. The Smokey Mountain 22 is a second cooker for hosts. Weber sizes it for 10 to 12, and nothing on it sears. Its own review says to buy it for the guest list, not for ambition.

What actually differs

  1. Three times the grate, six times the price

    726 sq in against 240 is about three to one. $549 against $89.99 is about six. You pay most per square inch for the cooker you light least often.

  2. Latched to carry, or booked to assemble

    The Jumbo Joe's Tuck-N-Carry hoop clamps lid to bowl, so it rides as one piece. The 22 comes as stacked sections, and Weber's flat $99 assembly booking is most tempting at this size.

  3. Ground level and chest height

    On the ground the Joe's grate sits barely above the ground, so it wants a table or tailgate. The 22's upper grate sits near chest height, and its coals sit behind a door at the bottom of a 48.5-inch column.

The scorecard, side by side

Both reviews are scored on the same six weighted categories, each bar on the same 0–10 scale, and every cell carries the reason that review gave. A row is marked won only where the two differ by a tenth or more. How we score →

Weber Jumbo Joe Charcoal Grill 18Weber Smokey Mountain Cooker Smoker 22
Heat Performance 25% of the score
8.1

The Original Kettle 18's bowl, grate and dampers, so the same two-zone fire; the thin plated grate stores little heat for searing.

9.3 won

The widest fuel bed in the range sits under one enameled water pan, and mass is what keeps a charcoal cook still.

Long-term Reliability 20% of the score
8.2

Porcelain bowl and lid carry ten years, but the plated grate, nylon handle and wire legs sit on much shorter cover.

9.0 won

Ten years covers the enamel, but three legs and every fastener under the tallest column in the line get two.

Build Quality 18% of the score
7.4

Enamel is the same as the big kettles, yet a wide bowl on short wire legs rocks on gravel or soft grass.

7.5

Weber scaled the barrel up and added one nylon handle, leaving plated steel grates and the same slim legs.

Ease of Use 15% of the score
7.6 won

The Tuck-N-Carry lock carries and holds the lid, but at 19.7 in tall every coal adjustment means crouching unless you supply a table.

6.5

Reaching coals under a loaded 48.5 inch column is a two-person lift, and one dial reports the whole cook.

Value 12% of the score
8.6

At $89.99 it matches the Go-Anywhere's price with 240 sq in against 160, and undercuts the same-sized $129.00 kettle.

8.5

At $549.00 this buys 726 sq in against 481 for the 18, with cover, pan and chamber all included.

Maintenance 10% of the score
6.8

No sweep feeds the ash pan, so clearing a cold bowl means lifting the grate out and tipping the whole grill.

7.5 won

Enamel wipes down easily, yet the largest water pan in the range comes out dirty after every single cook.

Avid Griller Score the six, weighted
7.8
8.2

Published figures that differ

Quoted from each maker's own specifications, as each review records them. Figures the two products publish identically are left out — only the differences are listed.

Dimensions, lid closed 19.7 x 19.7 x 20.5 in 48.5"H x 23"W x 24"D
Warranty 10 years bowl and lid; shorter on other parts 10 years bowl, lid and center ring; 2 years the rest

Which one is for you

Take the Weber Jumbo Joe Charcoal Grill 18

You want your first charcoal cooker, feed four to six, and can stand it on a table or tailgate.

Check price →
Take the Weber Smokey Mountain Cooker Smoker 22

You feed 10 to 12 at holidays and long weekends and want a packer brisket laid flat rather than curled.

Check price →

More head-to-heads

All comparisons →

Every score and figure on this page comes from our own reviews of these two products, linked above. We have not tested them side by side in one place; the comparison is between two full reviews, each built from the maker's published specifications and documentation. Prices move, and the ones quoted are the ones each review checked on its own date.