Traeger Ironwood 885 vs Woodridge Pro Plus

$1,399.99 for the Woodridge Pro Plus against around $1,008 for the insulated Ironwood 885. The Pro Plus premium buys a cabinet, not cooking.

Our pick Black Traeger Ironwood 885 pellet grill on wet gravel beside a lawn, grease bucket hanging, clipped hedge behind
Our verdict

We pick the Traeger Ironwood 885 Pellet Grill

Take the Ironwood 885 and the $392. The Pro Plus is a Woodridge Pro with a cupboard under it: 970 sq in, a 500 F ceiling, Super Smoke from 185 F, 200 pounds rolling on casters alone, $1,399.99. The Ironwood gives insulated walls, a 500 F ceiling and Super Smoke from 165 F for around $1,008. Our reviews score them 8.22 and 7.62, and the Pro Plus loses on value for exactly this reason: $250 of its price over the Pro buys storage and no cooking at all.

What actually differs

  1. The premium is a cabinet

    Traeger charges $250 over the Woodridge Pro for the enclosed cabinet, and the Pro Plus drops the Pro's rated bottom shelf and all-terrain wheels to get it. Against the Ironwood the gap is $392 for furniture.

  2. 20 F of smoke floor

    Super Smoke engages at 165 F on the Ironwood and waits until 185 F on the Pro Plus. Our Ironwood review names this comparison directly, because the cheaper grill is the one that smokes harder.

  3. What the Ironwood costs you instead

    Three years of cover against ten on rust-through, Legacy status on Traeger's own site, and 85 sq in less grate. Those are real, and they are what the $392 is actually weighed against.

How they score, category by category

The Traeger Ironwood 885 scores higher in 3 categories, the Woodridge Pro Plus in 2 categories. One is level.

Avid Griller Score, all six categories weighted
Traeger Ironwood 885 8.2out of 10 Higher by 0.6
Woodridge Pro Plus 7.6out of 10
  1. Heat Performance

    Counts for 25% of the score
    Traeger Ironwood 885 9.0 Better by 1.0
    Woodridge Pro Plus 8.0
    Why the Traeger Ironwood 885 scores 9.0

    Super Smoke opens at 165 F where the current $1,399.99 Woodridge Pro Plus waits until 185 F, behind insulated side walls.

    Why the Woodridge Pro Plus scores 8.0

    Super Smoke over a two-rack 970 sq in barrel, but the published ceiling stops at 500 F and no sear station exists.

  2. Long-term Reliability

    Counts for 20% of the score
    Traeger Ironwood 885 6.5
    Woodridge Pro Plus 7.0 Better by 0.5
    Why the Woodridge Pro Plus scores 7.0

    Ten years is rust-through only; controller, auger and fan get three years, the hot rod and RTD one, and resale voids it.

    Why the Traeger Ironwood 885 scores 6.5

    Three years is Traeger's shortest term, it needs an Authorized Seller on the receipt, and resale kills it outright.

  3. Build Quality

    Counts for 18% of the score
    Traeger Ironwood 885 8.5 Better by 1.0
    Woodridge Pro Plus 7.5
    Why the Traeger Ironwood 885 scores 8.5

    Porcelain coated steel grates, a stainless shelf and double-walled construction, on a barrel whose steel Traeger still declines to name.

    Why the Woodridge Pro Plus scores 7.5

    Gains an unrated cabinet but drops the Pro's rated bottom shelf and all-terrain wheels, and Traeger names no steel anywhere.

  4. Ease of Use

    Counts for 15% of the score
    Traeger Ironwood 885 9.0
    Woodridge Pro Plus 9.0

    Level: within a tenth of each other.

    Why the Traeger Ironwood 885 scores 9.0

    A pellet sensor, a cleanout trapdoor and 5 F steps from a phone remove the two chores cheaper Traegers keep.

    Why the Woodridge Pro Plus scores 9.0

    Four probe channels, WiFIRE and one-touch Super Smoke, offset by 200 lbs rolling on casters alone.

  5. Value

    Counts for 12% of the score
    Traeger Ironwood 885 8.7 Better by 2.7
    Woodridge Pro Plus 6.0
    Why the Traeger Ironwood 885 scores 8.7

    Around $1,008 buys insulation and Super Smoke from 165 F, where Traeger's $1,399.99 Woodridge Pro Plus lists neither, at the same 500 F ceiling.

    Why the Woodridge Pro Plus scores 6.0

    $250 over the Woodridge Pro buys storage and no cooking at all, in a line where every other step buys heat.

  6. Maintenance

    Counts for 10% of the score
    Traeger Ironwood 885 7.5
    Woodridge Pro Plus 8.0 Better by 0.5
    Why the Woodridge Pro Plus scores 8.0

    One keg takes grease and ash together, yet the firepot wants a vacuum roughly every 20 cooking hours.

    Why the Traeger Ironwood 885 scores 7.5

    The hopper empties without tools, but Traeger's own chart marks it absent for the EZ-Clean grease and ash keg.

See all six scores in one table
Category Traeger Ironwood 885Woodridge Pro Plus
Heat Performance (25%) 9.0 Better 8.0
Long-term Reliability (20%) 6.5 7.0 Better
Build Quality (18%) 8.5 Better 7.5
Ease of Use (15%) 9.0 9.0
Value (12%) 8.7 Better 6.0
Maintenance (10%) 7.5 8.0 Better
Avid Griller Score 8.2 7.6

Both reviews are scored on the same six weighted categories, on the same 0 to 10 scale, and each reason is the one that review gave. A category is marked better only where the two differ by a tenth or more. How we score →

Where the spec sheets differ

Quoted from each maker's own specifications, as each review records them. Figures the two products publish identically are left out, so only the differences are listed.

Cooking area Traeger Ironwood 885 885 sq in, two tiers Woodridge Pro Plus 970 sq in, 585 lower plus 385 upper
Hopper Traeger Ironwood 885 20 lbs, sensor fitted Woodridge Pro Plus 24 lb of pellets
Warranty Traeger Ironwood 885 3 years, material and workmanship Woodridge Pro Plus 10 years rust-through, 3 years controller and auger
Shipping Traeger Ironwood 885 Not published for this legacy model Woodridge Pro Plus $49.99, leaves the warehouse in 5 to 7 business days

Which one is for you

Choose the Traeger Ironwood 885 Pellet Grill

You want the most smoker for the money and can live with a discontinued model.

Choose the Traeger Woodridge Pro Plus

You specifically want enclosed storage under a current-line Traeger and the ten-year rust cover.

Check price →

More head-to-heads

All comparisons →

Every score and figure on this page comes from our own reviews of these two products, linked above. We have not tested them side by side in one place; the comparison is between two full reviews, each built from the maker's published specifications and documentation. Prices move, and the ones quoted are the ones each review checked on its own date.