Weber Jumbo Joe 18 vs Smokey Mountain 14

240 sq in on one 18-inch grate at $89.99 against 286 on two 14-inch grates at $289 from Weber. One sears and banks coals; the other is built for long cooks.

The verdict

We pick the Weber Jumbo Joe Charcoal Grill 18

The Jumbo Joe, unless low and slow is most of what you cook. At $89.99 it puts 240 sq in over an 18-inch fire that sears direct and banks for indirect. The Smokey Mountain 14 adds 46 sq in across two grates, a water pan and a fuel door. Weber lists it at $289; we found it around $219 at Amazon and Walmart in July. Either way, that money buys a cooker that does not sear.

What actually differs

  1. Fuel at shin level, or through a door

    On the ground, every coal the Jumbo Joe gets mid-cook goes in at shin level, over a bowl 19.7 inches tall. The 14's door lifts away, so fuel goes in without lifting the cooking section.

  2. Each has one chore that never goes away

    The Jumbo Joe has no sweep, so a cold bowl gets tipped over a bin. The 14's chamber keeps ash off its dampers, but its water pan needs emptying after every cook.

  3. What comes in the carton

    The 14 ships with a cover, water pan, charcoal chamber and lid thermometer. The Jumbo Joe's carton holds a bowl, lid, grate, wire legs and an ash pan.

The scorecard, side by side

Both reviews are scored on the same six weighted categories, each bar on the same 0–10 scale, and every cell carries the reason that review gave. A row is marked won only where the two differ by a tenth or more. How we score →

Weber Jumbo Joe Charcoal Grill 18Weber Smokey Mountain Cooker Smoker 14
Heat Performance 25% of the score
8.1

The Original Kettle 18's bowl, grate and dampers, so the same two-zone fire; the thin plated grate stores little heat for searing.

8.5 won

Four dampers, a water pan and an enamelled barrel give real control, though a 14-inch fire has less mass to steady it.

Long-term Reliability 20% of the score
8.2

Porcelain bowl and lid carry ten years, but the plated grate, nylon handle and wire legs sit on much shorter cover.

9.5 won

Ten years against rust through on bowl and lid, with aluminium at the door, so cover is longest where a smoker dies.

Build Quality 18% of the score
7.4

Enamel is the same as the big kettles, yet a wide bowl on short wire legs rocks on gravel or soft grass.

8.0 won

Porcelain-enamelled steel throughout, but the grates are plated steel rather than the cast iron Weber uses elsewhere.

Ease of Use 15% of the score
7.6

The Tuck-N-Carry lock carries and holds the lid, but at 19.7 in tall every coal adjustment means crouching unless you supply a table.

7.5

The thermometer and removable fuel door help, yet a small charcoal chamber means the cook checks in more often.

Value 12% of the score
8.6 won

At $89.99 it matches the Go-Anywhere's price with 240 sq in against 160, and undercuts the same-sized $129.00 kettle.

8.0

A cover and a decade of rust cover are included, though Weber's own listing has climbed well above street price.

Maintenance 10% of the score
6.8

No sweep feeds the ash pan, so clearing a cold bowl means lifting the grate out and tipping the whole grill.

8.0 won

Enamel wipes clean and the chamber keeps ash off the dampers, but the water pan needs emptying every cook.

Avid Griller Score the six, weighted
7.8
8.3

Published figures that differ

Quoted from each maker's own specifications, as each review records them. Figures the two products publish identically are left out — only the differences are listed.

Warranty 10 years bowl and lid; shorter on other parts 10 years bowl and lid, 2 years remaining parts

Which one is for you

Take the Weber Jumbo Joe Charcoal Grill 18

You have a small space and $90, mostly cook burgers, sausages and chicken, and have a table to stand it on.

Check price →
Take the Weber Smokey Mountain Cooker Smoker 14

Low and slow is most of your cooking, and paying more for a cooker that will not sear is fine by you.

Check price →

More head-to-heads

All comparisons →

Every score and figure on this page comes from our own reviews of these two products, linked above. We have not tested them side by side in one place; the comparison is between two full reviews, each built from the maker's published specifications and documentation. Prices move, and the ones quoted are the ones each review checked on its own date.