Weber Original Kettle 18 vs Original Kettle Premium 22

240 sq in under a 5 in lid for $129.00, or 363 sq in under 7.5 in with a lid dial, hinged grate and enclosed catcher for $229.00. Which Weber kettle to buy.

The verdict

We pick the Weber Original Kettle Premium Charcoal Grill 22

The Premium, unless you cook for two in a tight space. It adds 123 sq in of grate and 2.5 in more room under the lid. That covers the pork shoulder that would crowd the 18's dome, and its hinged grate keeps that shoulder fed into the afternoon. The 18 is still honest enamel and real dampers, sized right for a small household.

What actually differs

  1. Headroom: 5 inches against 7.5

    Weber prints the lid height for both. Steaks and chops never notice. A deep pork shoulder is tight in the 18 and cooks comfortably in the Premium. An upright bird needs measuring in either.

  2. Half as much grate again for guests

    Weber rates the 18 for 4 to 6, but bank the coals and each half holds a couple of steaks. The Premium's 363 sq in leaves a cool side that still holds a meal.

  3. A smaller fire costs less to light

    A half chimney goes further in the 18. For a two-person weeknight, that is a running saving the bigger bowl cannot match.

The scorecard, side by side

Both reviews are scored on the same six weighted categories, each bar on the same 0–10 scale, and every cell carries the reason that review gave. A row is marked won only where the two differ by a tenth or more. How we score →

Weber Original Kettle Charcoal Grill 18Weber Original Kettle Premium Charcoal Grill 22
Heat Performance 25% of the score
8.1

Lid and bowl dampers give the usual kettle control, but a 240 sq in grate leaves a cramped cool side once coals are banked.

8.8 won

The plain kettle's 22 in bowl and dampers, so the same fire, but the hinged grate lets you feed it mid-cook.

Long-term Reliability 20% of the score
8.6 won

Enamelled bowl and lid carry ten years, the aluminium legs shrug off rust, and only the grate and small parts sit on two.

8.4

Bowl and lid carry 10 years against rust-through, but the hinged grate, the dial and the wheels sit under the 2-year term.

Build Quality 18% of the score
8.3

Porcelain enamel and glass-reinforced nylon handles are the real thing; the plated grate and wire leg brace are where the money was saved.

8.3

Fused enamel, aluminium legs and dampers, and nylon handles are sound; Weber states no steel gauge and contradicts itself on area and damper count.

Ease of Use 15% of the score
7.4

No thermometer is listed, so dampers are set by feel, and a 5 in lid height turns away tall roasts.

8.6 won

A lid dial, a lid hook and flip-up grate sections remove the three chores that slow a plain kettle on a long cook.

Value 12% of the score
6.9

At $129.00 against $149.00 for 363 sq in, the bigger Weber kettle buys far more grate for each extra dollar.

7.2 won

$229.00 at Weber buys the $149.00 Original's cooking plus three convenience parts; a burgers-only cook pays $80 for little.

Maintenance 10% of the score
8.4

One-Touch sweeps ash into a shallow open catcher in a few strokes, and the enamel wipes down; nothing encloses the ash.

8.9 won

One-Touch blades push ash into an enclosed catcher, warranted five years, so emptying it is one lift and no grey drift on the patio.

Avid Griller Score the six, weighted
8.0
8.4

Published figures that differ

Quoted from each maker's own specifications, as each review records them. Figures the two products publish identically are left out — only the differences are listed.

Lid height 5 in 7.5 in
Shipping carton 20.4 x 20.4 x 14.6 in, 24.3 lb boxed 14.9 x 24.4 x 24.4 in, 37.3 lb

Which one is for you

Take the Weber Original Kettle Charcoal Grill 18

Two people, a small balcony, burgers and chops on weeknights, and a firm $129.00 budget.

Check price →
Take the Weber Original Kettle Premium Charcoal Grill 22

You cook for guests or run a pork shoulder through the afternoon, and want the room under the lid for it.

Check price →

More head-to-heads

All comparisons →

Every score and figure on this page comes from our own reviews of these two products, linked above. We have not tested them side by side in one place; the comparison is between two full reviews, each built from the maker's published specifications and documentation. Prices move, and the ones quoted are the ones each review checked on its own date.