Traeger Woodridge Pro Plus vs Weber Searwood XL 600

$1,399.99 for 970 sq in, a 500 F ceiling and a cabinet, against $1,199 for 972 sq in and 600. The Traeger's premium buys storage; the Weber's price buys heat.

The verdict

We pick the Weber Searwood XL 600 Pellet Grill

Buy the Searwood and keep about $200. The two cook on almost the same area, 970 sq in against 972, and the Weber reaches 600 where the Traeger stops at 500. What the Pro Plus adds for $1,399.99 is a cupboard, Super Smoke between 185 and 225, and four probe channels. Traeger itself calls it the Woodridge Pro with an added cabinet, and the Weber is cheaper than either.

What actually differs

  1. A cupboard against an open shelf

    The Pro Plus closes pellets and tools behind two doors. The Searwood has a wide open shelf between its legs. If dry storage is the reason you are looking, that is the whole of the Traeger's case.

  2. Four probe channels, one probe in the box

    The Pro Plus runs two wired and two Bluetooth probes at once, but ships a single wired probe. The Searwood ships two. Out of the box, the cheaper grill watches more meat.

  3. 200 pounds on casters

    To fit the cabinet, the Pro Plus drops the Pro's all-terrain wheels and rolls on casters alone, at 200 lbs. The Searwood is 157.80 pounds on two wheels. Neither travels far, but soft ground suits only one.

The scorecard, side by side

Both reviews are scored on the same six weighted categories, each bar on the same 0–10 scale, and every cell carries the reason that review gave. A row is marked won only where the two differ by a tenth or more. How we score →

Traeger Woodridge Pro PlusWeber Searwood XL 600 Pellet Grill
Heat Performance 25% of the score
8.0

Super Smoke over a two-rack 970 sq in barrel, but the published ceiling stops at 500 F and no sear station exists.

9.0 won

A 180 to 600 span with no large sheet diffuser is unusual reach for an auger-fed cooker.

Long-term Reliability 20% of the score
7.0

Ten years is rust-through only; controller, auger and fan get three years, the hot rod and RTD one, and resale voids it.

7.0

Weber covers the cook box for five years, and everything that burns or fails for three.

Build Quality 18% of the score
7.5

Gains an unrated cabinet but drops the Pro's rated bottom shelf and all-terrain wheels, and Traeger names no steel anywhere.

8.0 won

157.80 pounds, a porcelain-enameled lid and stainless Flavorizer bars, but the grate metal is printed two ways.

Ease of Use 15% of the score
9.0

Four probe channels, WiFIRE and one-touch Super Smoke, offset by 200 lbs rolling on casters alone.

9.3 won

A fuel gauge that alerts you at low pellets, two probes, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, all included.

Value 12% of the score
6.0

$250 over the Woodridge Pro buys storage and no cooking at all, in a line where every other step buys heat.

8.0 won

$1,199 buys probes and connectivity, but the cover is $94.99 and the front table another $99.99.

Maintenance 10% of the score
8.0

One keg takes grease and ash together, yet the firepot wants a vacuum roughly every 20 cooking hours.

9.0 won

Grease and ash pull out together from the front, rather than from under a loaded cabinet.

Avid Griller Score the six, weighted
7.6
8.3

Published figures that differ

Quoted from each maker's own specifications, as each review records them. Figures the two products publish identically are left out — only the differences are listed.

Cooking area 970 sq in, 585 lower plus 385 upper 972 sq in, a 630 grate plus a 342 shelf
Warranty 10 years rust-through, 3 years controller and auger 5 years cook box, 3 years electrics and fire parts
Shipping $49.99, leaves the warehouse in 5 to 7 business days Free on orders over $99, restrictions apply

Which one is for you

Take the Traeger Woodridge Pro Plus

Your patio has nowhere dry for pellets and tools, and you want Super Smoke and four probe channels on one cart.

Check price →
Take the Weber Searwood XL 600 Pellet Grill

You want the hotter grill, two probes in the box and $200 back, and can store your tools elsewhere.

Check price →

More head-to-heads

All comparisons →

Every score and figure on this page comes from our own reviews of these two products, linked above. We have not tested them side by side in one place; the comparison is between two full reviews, each built from the maker's published specifications and documentation. Prices move, and the ones quoted are the ones each review checked on its own date.